Johannes Sixt <j...@kdbg.org> writes:
> Am 22.03.2013 16:02, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> Vadim Zeitlin <vz-...@zeitlins.org> writes:
>>
>>> A C++ method start such as
>>>
>>> void
>>> foo::bar()
>>>
>>> wasn't recognized by cpp diff driver as it mistakenly included "foo::bar"
>>> as a
>>> label. However the colon in a label can't be followed by another colon, so
>>> recognize this case specially to correctly detect C++ methods using this
>>> style.
>
> Much appreciated!
>
>>> PATTERNS("cpp",
>>> /* Jump targets or access declarations */
>>> - "!^[ \t]*[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z_0-9]*:.*$\n"
>>> + "!^[ \t]*[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z_0-9]*:([^:].*$|$)\n"
>>
>> Hmm. Wouldn't "find a word (possibly after indentation), colon and
>> then either a non-colon or end of line" be sufficient and simpler?
>> iow, something like...
>>
>> "!^[ \t]*[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z_0-9]*:([^:]|$)"
>
> Yes, indeed. We don't need to match more than necessary in a negative
> pattern. The \n must still remain, though.
... because \n is not for matching against the text, but merely to
separate the regular expressions, right?
I also wonder if
label :
should also be caught, or is it too weird format to be worth
supporting?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
