Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Note that we leave "return undef;" in validate_address on purpose,
> even though Perlcritic may complain.  The primary "return" site of
> the function returns whatever is in the scaler variable $address, so
> it is pointless to change only the other "return undef;" to "return".
> The caller must be prepared to see an array with a single undef as
> the return value from this subroutine anyway.

The way I understood it:
All callsites only ever call validate_address via
validate_address_list, which in turn maps a list of addresses by
calling validate_address on each address.  Therefore, validate_address
returning an undef in one codepath is correct.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to