Neil Horman <> writes:

>       I've recently started looking into the possibility of having git support
> multiple in-progress sequencers, and wanted to solicit opinions for how best 
> to
> do it.... The thoughts I had were:
> 1) A per branch sequence directory...
> 2) Augment the git-stash command...

3) A per branch working tree.

That is how I would do this myself, anyway ;-)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to