On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 03:06:51PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 11:06:28AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Neil Horman <nhor...@tuxdriver.com> writes:
> > > I've recently started looking into the possibility of having git support
> > > multiple in-progress sequencers, and wanted to solicit opinions for how
> > > best to
> > > do it.... The thoughts I had were:
> > >
> > > 1) A per branch sequence directory...
> > > 2) Augment the git-stash command...
> > 3) A per branch working tree.
> > That is how I would do this myself, anyway ;-)
> Not sure I completely follow. Are you suggesting that all untracked
> files, indexes and meta data in .git be saved during a branch switch?
Scratch that, after some digging I located the git-new-workdir script in the
contrib directory, which does what we're talking about here.
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html