Adam Spiers <> writes:

> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:09:28AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Reflowing of the text is very much unappreciated X-<.  
> I very much appreciate the excellent job you do as maintainer; your
> attention to detail results in an incredibly high quality project.
> However I do occasionally find your communication style unnecessarily
> abrasive.  Maybe that's just me.

Sorry for being me X-<.  Yeah, I agree that the above came out to be
more blunt than needed.

It is usually OK to re-flow the text in the paragraph you are
touching. After all, for the purpose of reviewing, people can just
blindly apply and then ask "diff --color-words".  In this case,
however, there was some changes that conflict in the vicinity, and
reflowing made the resolution unnecessarily more cumbersome.

I have briefly looked at this series, but it severely conflicts with
a few topics in flight that touch the infrastructure you are using,
so I haven't merged it to 'pu'. Perhaps after things calm down, we
may want to ask you to reroll on top of updated codebase.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to