Matthieu Moy <matthieu....@grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
> Thomas Rast <tr...@inf.ethz.ch> writes:
>> So how can we fix that? We could try to somehow figure out that M:sub/
>> refers to the same thing as M^2:/, by looking at them at the tree level.
>> Let's provisionally call this --follow-tree-rename.
> There was a patch serie long ago that implemented directory rename
> I'm not sure why it hasn't been merged.
I have forgotten about this topic (and its numerous iterations in
the past), but it appears me that people mostly lost interest after
v7 review cycle where the series looked like a solution that is
looking for a problem.
I took another quick look at it now, but it tells me that the series
was a good platform to discuss the design and the goals but it was
far from ready with comments like this "// FIXME: leaks like sieve".
As to the design (not the implementation), I find what are in the
documentation updates in [v9 2/6] more or less reasonable, even
though I still doubt that foo/ => bar/, when the constituent files
are not moved a la "mv foo/* bar/." is useful. The change in [v9
3/6] is distasteful and should just be killed.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html