From: "Ramkumar Ramachandra" <artag...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 8:54 PM
Thomas Rast wrote:
There is a market for a rename detection that works at the tree level.


Exactly.  And making it auto-follow with a low threshold would be a
great default.  We'll have to deal with D/F conflicts that Junio was
talking about in (2), every once in a while.  We'll have a lot more
incentive to build the D/F conflict resolution process a nice UI.

git-core will actually start working with trees the way it works with blobs.
--

Is this not similar to the previous attempts at bulk rename detection? Such as $gmane/160233.

A practical bulk rename detection would be good. It doesn't have to be perfect.

Philip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to