Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:

>>> ...
>>> +             git for-each-ref --format='%(refname) %(objectname)' |
>>> +             while read ref a
>>>               do
>>> -                     test $a == $b && continue
>>> +                     case "$before" in
>>> +                     *"$ref $a"*)
>>> +                             continue
> I wonder if we should bother with this at all. The purpose of the code
> was mainly to show to users that they should report the success only
> if the refs have been updated, but the code is becoming more
> obfuscated, a comment should do the trick. And then, we can just
> report success for all the refs (and explain in the comment why).

Are you proposing to say "ok $ref" to everything we see in the
resulting repository, even the ones the caller of remote-testgit did
not ask us to do anything with?

Wouldn't the caller be surprised if we did so?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to