On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> + git for-each-ref --format='%(refname) %(objectname)' |
>>>> + while read ref a
>>>> - test $a == $b && continue
>>>> + case "$before" in
>>>> + *"$ref $a"*)
>>>> + continue
>> I wonder if we should bother with this at all. The purpose of the code
>> was mainly to show to users that they should report the success only
>> if the refs have been updated, but the code is becoming more
>> obfuscated, a comment should do the trick. And then, we can just
>> report success for all the refs (and explain in the comment why).
> Are you proposing to say "ok $ref" to everything we see in the
> resulting repository, even the ones the caller of remote-testgit did
> not ask us to do anything with?
> Wouldn't the caller be surprised if we did so?
Why would it? The only effective difference is what you'll see
reported in the UI, but there's no user here.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html