On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>>> ...
>>>> +             git for-each-ref --format='%(refname) %(objectname)' |
>>>> +             while read ref a
>>>>               do
>>>> -                     test $a == $b && continue
>>>> +                     case "$before" in
>>>> +                     *"$ref $a"*)
>>>> +                             continue
>>>
>> I wonder if we should bother with this at all. The purpose of the code
>> was mainly to show to users that they should report the success only
>> if the refs have been updated, but the code is becoming more
>> obfuscated, a comment should do the trick. And then, we can just
>> report success for all the refs (and explain in the comment why).
>
> Are you proposing to say "ok $ref" to everything we see in the
> resulting repository, even the ones the caller of remote-testgit did
> not ask us to do anything with?
>
> Wouldn't the caller be surprised if we did so?

Why would it? The only effective difference is what you'll see
reported in the UI, but there's no user here.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to