Ramkumar Ramachandra <[email protected]> writes:
>> * rr/die-on-missing-upstream (2013-05-22) 2 commits
>> - sha1_name: fix error message for @{<N>}, @{<date>}
>> - sha1_name: fix error message for @{u}
>>
>> When a reflog notation is used for implicit "current branch", we
>> did not say which branch and worse said "branch ''".
>>
>> Waiting for series of rerolls to settle.
>
> I'm happy with the version in pu, and I don't intend to send any
> re-rolls.
OK, then I'll take a final look at it (I may or may not have
comments after doing so) before merging it down.
> Is there something you're not happy with?
By the way, you probably should stop thinking in terms of "me" being
(un)happy. I am just trying to help by preventing (collectively) us
making silly mistakes.
> * publish-rev: the @{push} thing is still in the early poc stages.
I presume this is the one that may someday lay foundations for Tytso's
"do not rebase beyond this point, as I have published it already"?
> * for-each-ref-pretty: not ready; working with Duy.
I haven't been paying too much attention to it, but my impression
was a "superset" syntax is coming? That would be going in the right
direction.
> * push-current-head: ready but for the commit message: in your
> opinion, it doesn't "fix" anything other than the output. I'll
> rewrite and submit soon.
I do not recall what this one is about, but we'll see when you send
it out.
> * pickaxe-doc: you had some more comments in latest iteration, but the
> returns from a re-roll are diminishing. Frankly, the work is too
> boring: the first few iterations were interesting, because I was
> learning;...
Yeah, some parts of the project is boring and that is not a news.
Think of documentation updates as helping others to learn.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
