On 05/29/2013 06:53 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu> writes:
>> [...]
>> +            current_bad_sha1 = xmalloc(20);
>> +            hashcpy(current_bad_sha1, sha1);
> 
> This, together with 18/25, may hint that we want hashdup()?

I thought about it, but was surprised that I could only find one or two
other places in the existing code that would use such a function.  But
sure, I would be happy to submit a patch.

I think hashdup() needn't be inline, so the definition can't go with its
cousins in cache.h.  There is no cache.c.  So where would be the best
place to define hashdup()?  object.c?  sha1_name.c?

While I'm at it, I think it would be nice to have constants like

#define SHA1_LEN 20
#define SHA1_HEX_LEN 40

and start using those instead of magic numbers.  Any objections (or
suggestions for better names)?

Michael

-- 
Michael Haggerty
mhag...@alum.mit.edu
http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to