Ramkumar Ramachandra <artag...@gmail.com> writes:

> SZEDER Gábor wrote:
>> Well, people out there might have completion scriplets for their
>> aliases or custom git commands which use __git_complete_file().
>> Removing this function would break those scripts.
> What is the advantage of using __git_complete_file() over
> __git_complete_revlist_file()?  Isn't it just a misleading alias?


But "Those who have been using it can update their script" is not an
answer you give when dealing with a regression.

I think the right thing is to add __git_complete_file() back in;
perhaps strip support of A..B/A...B range notations from it, but
that is an independent change.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to