Jeff King <> writes:

> I'm a little negative on handling just SIGTERM. That would make the test
> pass, but does it really address the overall issue? To me, the
> usefulness is having exit values with consistent meanings.

Yes.  Unless the goal is to give Windows port pratically the same
signal semantics as ports on other platforms, I do not think special
casing SIGTERM (unless it is a very common signal on Windows and
others are unlikely to be useful) buys us much.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to