On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Johannes Sixt <j.s...@viscovery.net> wrote:
> Am 6/9/2013 22:31, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:
>>> I'm a little negative on handling just SIGTERM. That would make the test
>>> pass, but does it really address the overall issue? To me, the
>>> usefulness is having exit values with consistent meanings.
>> Yes.  Unless the goal is to give Windows port pratically the same
>> signal semantics as ports on other platforms, I do not think special
>> casing SIGTERM (unless it is a very common signal on Windows and
>> others are unlikely to be useful) buys us much.
> I'm thinking the same. And, no, SIGTERM is not very common on Windows.

I have no strong feelings on SIGTERM, but my knee-jerk reaction is the
same. AFAIK, the only issue we've seen with it has been this one,
which is synthetic.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to