On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 04:24:34PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> The name "lifo", however, is too strongly tied to the way how the
> function implements its behaviour, and does not describe what the
> behaviour _means_.
> Replace this field with an enum rev_sort_order, with two possible
> values: REV_SORT_IN_GRAPH_ORDER and REV_SORT_BY_COMMIT_DATE, and
> update the existing code. The mechanical replacement rule is:
> "lifo == 0" is equivalent to "sort_order == REV_SORT_BY_COMMIT_DATE"
> "lifo == 1" is equivalent to "sort_order == REV_SORT_IN_GRAPH_ORDER"
Thanks. Having looked at this code for the first time in a long time
recently, I was very confused by the purpose of the "lifo" flag; this
patch would have made it much clearer.
Patch itself looks fine to me.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html