On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:36:21PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > I like the latter option. It takes a non-trivial amount of time to load
> > the commits from disk, and now we are potentially doing it 2 or 3 times
> > for a run (once to parse, once to get the author info for topo-sort, and
> > possibly later to show it if --pretty is given; though I did not check
> > and maybe we turn off save_commit_buffer with --pretty). It would be
> > nice to have an extended parse_object that handled that. I'm not sure of
> > the interface. Maybe variadic with pairs of type/slab, like:
> >
> > parse_commit_extended(commit,
> > PARSE_COMMIT_AUTHORDATE, &authordate_slab,
> > PARSE_COMMIT_DONE);
> >
> > ?
>
> What I had in mind actually was a custom slab tailored for each
> caller that is an array of struct. If the caller is interested in
> authordate and authorname, instead of populating two separate
> authordate_slab and authorname_slab, the caller declares a
>
> struct {
> unsigned long date;
> char name[FLEX_ARRAY];
> } author_info;
>
> prepares author_info_slab, and use your commit_parser API to fill
> them.
Yes, I think it is nicer to stay in one slab if you have multiple
values, but it means more custom code for the caller. If the
commit_parser API is nice, it should not be that much code, though.
It does make it harder to support arbitrary combinations directly in
parse_commit. If a caller wants to also parse_commit and use the same
buffer to pick out its custom information, I think we'd need to do one
of:
1. Give parse_commit a callback, so that the callback can pick out the
data it wants while parse_commit has the commit buffer in memory.
E.g.:
void grab_author_info(const char *buf, unsigned long len, void *data)
{
struct author_info *ai = data;
/* fill fields from buffer */
}
...
parse_commit_extra(commit, grab_author_info,
slab_at(&author_slab, commit));
2. Teach parse_commit to operate not only on a raw commit object, but
also on the commit_parser API. Like:
struct commit_parser parser = {0};
/* actually open the object and start our incremental parser */
init_commit_parser(&parser, commit);
/* fill in parents, date, etc, as parse_commit does now */
parse_commit_from_parser(commit, &parser);
/* fill in whatever extra data we are interested in */
*slab_at(&slab, commit) = get_author_date(&parser);
/* done, drop the buffer */
close_commit_parser(&parser);
The latter would need to handle transferring ownership of the buffer to
"struct commit" from "struct commit_parser" when save_commit_buffer is
turned off.
I think we're a bit high-level now to be making such decisions, though,
as we do not even have such a commit_parser API.
-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
