Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 0. You do not take offense, no matter what. If someone attacks
> you irrationally, you do not respond. This is a public mailing
> list, and we are all rational people: the attacker has already
> humiliated herself in public, and everyone can see that.
> I suspect it mostly has to do with the desire to make sure that
> bystanders do not get an impression that the one who speaks last
> gives the conclusion to the discussion, so stating "The attacker
> being the one who speaks last in the discussion does not mean the
> conclusion is his." explicitly might be one way to make it more
> practically useful by alleviating the urge to respond, instead of
> saying "no matter what".
> I dunno.
Actually my motivation is worse than that in at least one of the cases
I am assuming Ram is referring to.
I don't think most bystanders would misunderstand if I let a certain
person alone instead of responding and saying "You are being
unproductive. Please stop." But that certain person seems to
misunderstand, whether I say that or not. So when I lose patience I
say so, knowing that it will spark a discussion with others, knowing
that that discussion needs to happen and that if the problem is not
addressed I will continue to lose motivation for regular work on-list.
Is that an instance of taking offense and letting emotion overtake
reason? Is that against the rules?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html