On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Phil Hord <phil.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Felipe Contreras
> <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Felipe Contreras
>> <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Same as before, but:
>> Also, remove the patches from Martin von Zweigbergk, because
>> apparently some people have trouble understanding that they were not
>> part of this series.
> Please try not to sound disgruntled. This attitude is toxic. You have
> turned this change into a complaint: that "some people have trouble
> understanding" which shows a genuine lack of understanding and
> compassion on your part. Instead you can phrase your change notes
> more helpfully if you make changes only when you yourself actually
> believe the change should be made. If you cannot do this, perhaps you
> can pretend.
That would be dishonest. Moreover, there wasn't a good reason to
remove these patches, I made it clear I added those patches only to
make sure the real patches of this series worked correctly. Also, I
clarified that to Thomas Rast, only to receive a totally
Why don't you ask Thomas Rast to be more constructive?
Then Johan Herland uses that as an example of a constructive
comment. Why don't you correct Johan Herland?
No, you pick the easy target: me.
I already dd more than my fair share by carrying these 36 patches
through several iterations, yet you ask *more* of me. Why don't you
ask more of the people that just hit reply on their MUA?
Thomas' task was easy; he simply had to say "Oh, these aren't meant to
be applied, got it."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html