On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Phil Hord <phil.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Felipe Contreras
>> <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Felipe Contreras
>>> <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Same as before, but:
>>> Also, remove the patches from Martin von Zweigbergk, because
>>> apparently some people have trouble understanding that they were not
>>> part of this series.
>> Please try not to sound disgruntled. This attitude is toxic. You have
>> turned this change into a complaint: that "some people have trouble
>> understanding" which shows a genuine lack of understanding and
>> compassion on your part.  Instead you can phrase your change notes
>> more helpfully if you make changes only when you yourself actually
>> believe the change should be made.  If you cannot do this, perhaps you
>> can pretend.
> That would be dishonest. Moreover, there wasn't a good reason to
> remove these patches, I made it clear I added those patches only to
> make sure the real patches of this series worked correctly. Also, I
> clarified that to Thomas Rast[1], only to receive a totally
> unconstructive comment[2].
> Why don't you ask Thomas Rast to be more constructive[2]?
> Then Johan Herland uses that as an example of a constructive
> comment[3]. Why don't you correct Johan Herland?

I do not see what their comments have to do with your attitude.
Aren't your own man with cogent self-will and personal responsibility?
 Why should I also have to consider these other emails which I have
not bothered to read yet?

> No, you pick the easy target: me.

You seem to have mistaken me for someone else.  Moreover, you seem to
have mistaken you for someone else.  You are the least easy target I
know of on this list.  Everyone else seems open to community

> I already dd more than my fair share by carrying these 36 patches
> through several iterations, yet you ask *more* of me. Why don't you
> ask more of the people that just hit reply on their MUA?
> Thomas' task was easy; he simply had to say "Oh, these aren't meant to
> be applied, got it."
> [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/227039
> [2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/227040
> [3] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/227102

I did not comment on their posts because they did not catch my eye.
Rebase and cherry-pick improvements are interesting to me, so I read
your post.  I will try not to make this mistake again.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to