Thomas Rast <tr...@inf.ethz.ch> writes:
> Conveniently enough we have seen both already ;-) Andrew's version for
> commit.c could use a bit of refactorization, since it inserts the same
> code in two places, but then it's about the same complexity as the
> change for rebase.
> I'm not sure it's worth arguing about whether the "fixup! fixup!" is a
> symptom of some underlying problem, and changing rebase is only tapering
> over the symptom; or whether it's actually a useful distinction.
If they are about the same complexity, then my instict tells me that
it is a better design not to strip on the writing side.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html