Excerpts from Junio C Hamano's message of Tue Jun 25 14:45:07 -0700 2013:
> After all, autosquash will give the user an opportunity to eyeball
> the result of automatic rearrangement. If the user did this:
>
> git commit -m original
> git commit --fixup original ;# obviously fixing the first one
> git commit --fixup '!fixup original' ;# explicitly fixing the second
> git commit --fixup original ;# may want to fix the first one
>
> and then "git rebase --autosquash" gave him this:
>
> pick d78c915 original
> fixup 0c6388e original
> fixup d15b556 !fixup original
> fixup 1e39bcd original
I assume you mean:
pick d78c915 original
fixup 0c6388e fixup! original
fixup d15b556 fixup! fixup! original
fixup 1e39bcd !fixup! original
The current master code tries to keep the original commit message
intact. I assume you would preserve that behavior, so you would want to
see "fixup! fixup!"
> it may not be what the user originally intended, but I think it is
> OK.
>
> As long as "!fixup original" message is kept in the buffer, the user
> can notice and rearrange, e.g.
Thomas's patch didn't do this: fixup! or squash! after the first is
simply discarded, so you see:
pick d78c915 original
fixup 0c6388e fixup! original
fixup d15b556 fixup! original
fixup 1e39bcd !fixup! original
But it will be a simple change to keep all the fixup!s and squash!s. I
will do this (and try to make up for the carelessness of my previous
patch).
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html