On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 02:45:04PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:
> > I think I got us off-track with my expectation of ending the one case
> > with a conflicted index. But caring about that is even more unlikely. I
> > think Thomas's original patch is probably a happy medium.
> OK, so should I consider it Reviewed-by: peff?
Yes, modulo the breakage of the &&- chain that Thomas mentioned.
> > As an orthogonal matter, we probably should reverse the order of
> > updating HEAD and the index/working tree, as it does not make much sense
> > to me to do the former if the latter is not possible (and that is the
> > case even with the current code).
OK. I'll prepare a series with both patches. Stand by...
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html