Thomas Rast <tr...@inf.ethz.ch> writes:
> Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:
>> (2) In the ranges "-L <anything>,/B/ -L /C/,<anything>", the
>> beginning of the second range is found by choosing C that comes
>> _after_ the end of the previous range (/B/ may choose either
>> the second or the 4th line, and the only C that comes after
>> either of them is the 5th line and that is where the second
>> range should begin, not at the beginning of the file). The
>> same for "-L 1,3 -L /C/" (only C that comes after 3 is eligible
>> to be the beginning of the second range).
> So passing several -L arguments does not blame the union of what each
> argument would blame individually? Doesn't that make it rather harder
> to explain?
> In any case, if you define it like that for blame, log -L should be
> changed to match.
I thought "log -L" was fundamnetally different as it is per path.
For example, -L1,100:hello.c and -L5,105:goodbye.c would not
If you mean to coalesce -L1,100:hello.c and -L5,105:hello.c into a
single -L1,105:hello.c, then yes I think it makes sense.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html