Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> writes:

> This one, on the other hand, changes the "shape" of the repo (now with
> holes) and might need to go through the same process we do with this
> series. Maybe we should prepare for it now. Do you have a use case for
> size-based filtering? What can we do with a repo with some arbitrary
> blobs missing? Another form of this is narrow clone, where we cut by
> paths, not by blob size. Narrow clone sounds more useful to me because
> it's easier to control what we leave out.

I was about to say "Hear, hear", but then stopped with a question to
myself: why are these "some people do not want them" paths in the
same repository in the first place?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to