Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> writes: > The idea is the same, but my patch is a bit different (use of realpath > instead of real_path, I didn't remember git has real_path). I'm fine > with Ram being the author.
Thanks, both of you, for clarification. >> Compared to not being able to edit, it may be a small price to pay >> for those who do need to suffer the broken editor, but the patch >> makes those who do not need this workaround to pay the price. > > Does looking at the edited file's path happen often? I have never done > that before. I ask because in order to avoid the price for those > users, the code could get a little bit more complicated (detecting if > the given relative path traverse backward outside a symlink..). To me > it seems like a good trade off in favor of simpler code. Yeah, I was being my usual cautious self, as somebody has to play that role. I think the code as-is would be an OK trade off. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
