On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 09:41:52AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > Of the two, I think the latter is more sensible; the former is
> > unnecessarily placing the burden on the user to match "--split" with
> > their use of "%(rest)". The second is pointless without the first.
> >
> > A patch to implement (2) is below.
> As I'd queue this on top of the revert, I had to wrangle it a bit to
> make it relative, i.e. "this resurrects what the other reverted
> patch did but in a weaker/safer form".

Yeah, sorry. After doing the patch I had the thought that maybe the
least invasive thing would be the fix rather than the straight revert
(we are counting on my assertion that just reverting out part of the
series will be OK; I'm pretty sure that is the case, but it is not
risk-free, either).

I didn't see the result of your wrangling in pu, but I will keep an eye
out to double-check it (unless you did not finish, in which case I am
happy to do the wrangling myself).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to