[ It's cool you're working on this, I'd really like a git-repack in C.
That would fix this
Stefan Beller <stefanbel...@googlemail.com> writes:
> From: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclo...@gmail.com>
> pack-objects learns a few more options to take over what's been done
> by git-repack.sh. cmd_repack() becomes a wrapper around
I think the patch would read easier if these were split into two
patches: one doing the real stuff in pack-objects, and then getting rid
of git-repack.sh to replace it with a trivial built-in.
Actually, I'm wondering why pack-objects requires so much changes.
git-repack.sh was already a relatively small wrapper around
pack-objects, and did not need the new options you add, so why are they
needed? In particular adding the new --update-info option that just does
> + if (repack_flags & REPACK_UPDATE_INFO)
> + update_server_info(0);
seems overkill to me: why don't you just let cmd_repack call
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html