Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes:
> Hi Stefan,
> On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, Stefan Beller wrote:
>> So you rather propose to have
>> - show_submodule_summary(o->file, one ? one->path : two->path,
>> + show_submodule_summary(o->file, one->path ? one->path :
> I do. The reason is that one->path could be NULL (but not both one->path
> and two->path) and the summary would not be as helpful as possible if it
> wrote "(null)" instead of the path of the submodule.
Also some C libraries would choke when asked to %s format a NULL,
instead of giving "(null)" to avoid segfaulting (which I think is a
quirk in glibc).
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html