On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:39:34AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > Older versions of JGit used to put duplicate objects in a pack, and
> > IIRC Shawn declared that a bug in the packer and fixed it, so from
> > that point of view, I think rejecting is probably the right thing,
> > even though I think warning and continuing is also acceptable and
> > indeed may be better.
> Also repacking may have a funny corner case. I do not recall the
> details as the above was a long time ago, but when I was tracking it
> down, a delta was made against one copy of the base object, and
> referred to it using delta-offset, while there was another copy of
> the base object which was found by the bisection search, and from
> there on, the inconsistencies between these two (they represent the
> same payload, but they are at different offsets in the same pack and
> with different in-pack sizes) led to some funky behaviour.

Thanks for the pointer. I found this commit:


which is presumably what you're thinking of.

I did not run into the problem described in my case, but presumably I
did not have a delta cycle between the multiple versions. In theory we
should find the same copy of the object each time we search, but there
are enough code paths to access the objects that I would not be
surprised if such funkiness is still triggerable, including infinite

That makes me inclined to teach index-pack to reject duplicate objects
in a single pack in order to prevent denial-of-service attacks. We can
potentially make them work in all code paths, but given that nobody
should be doing this legitimately, rejecting the duplicates outright
keeps our attack surface small, and nobody but attackers or users of
broken implementations should care.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to