Nicolas Pitre <n...@fluxnic.net> writes: > Subject says it all... at last ! > > This can also be fetched here: > > git://git.linaro.org/people/nico/git > > Demonstration of what it does at the moment: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/233038 > > I'd like to preserve the author time stamps as they relate to where in > the world I was when the corresponding code was written. You'll notice > I didn't work on the code in the same order as it is now presented.
We can also notice things like "From: user@machine.(none)" ;-) > Still open question: what to do with a thin pack. Should we really > complete it with local objects upon reception, or were we only over > paranoid at the time we imposed this rule? I do not think paranoia had much to do with it. I am afraid that allowing a delta in a pack to depend on a base in another pack means that the former pack becomes unusable without the latter, which would make object store management (e.g. partial repacking) a lot more cumbersome, no? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html