Nicolas Pitre <n...@fluxnic.net> writes:
> Subject says it all... at last !
> This can also be fetched here:
> Demonstration of what it does at the moment:
> I'd like to preserve the author time stamps as they relate to where in
> the world I was when the corresponding code was written. You'll notice
> I didn't work on the code in the same order as it is now presented.
We can also notice things like "From: user@machine.(none)" ;-)
> Still open question: what to do with a thin pack. Should we really
> complete it with local objects upon reception, or were we only over
> paranoid at the time we imposed this rule?
I do not think paranoia had much to do with it. I am afraid that
allowing a delta in a pack to depend on a base in another pack means
that the former pack becomes unusable without the latter, which
would make object store management (e.g. partial repacking) a lot
more cumbersome, no?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html