On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Nicolas Pitre <n...@fluxnic.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2013, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclo...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  Should be up to date with Nico's latest implementation and also cover
>>  additions to the format that everybody seems to agree on:
>>   - new types for canonical trees and commits
>>   - sha-1 table covering missing objects in thin packs
> Yes, I've tweaked the format again.  I've implemented the code needed to
> carry canonical commit and tree objects in pack v4.  And things are much
> simpler if the canonical commit and tree types are identical to pack v2.
> Therefore the new types are used for the pack v4 optimized commit and
> tree representations.

Phew, index-pack finally produces .idx identical to packv4-create
output. Yeah using new types for v4 tree and commit should help. I
have a lot of "if (packv4 && type == OBJ_TREE)" tests, now they become
"if (type == OBJ_PV4_TREE)". Now rebasing on your tree.. Next step:
thin pack support in index-pack, then export/move code in
packv4-create to support v4 in pack-objects.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to