Jens Lehmann <jens.lehm...@web.de> writes:

> But I'm not terribly happy about having the --for-status option in the
> submodule script in the first place, as I believe it should rather be
> handled by wt-status.c itself (reading the output of submodule summary
> using the start_command()/finish_command() combo instead of the simple
> run_command() currently used and prepending the comment char by using
> status_printf() & friends for each line).

I went the --for-status way because it's easier to do this in shell than
in C. But I'm close to be convinced that implementing this on the
wt-status.c side is better. I'll try a re-roll doing this when I get
time.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to