On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:37:08AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > I wonder if GCC has changed it's behaviour to more closely match C99.
> > Clang as a compatibility article about this sort of issue:
> >
> >     http://clang.llvm.org/compatibility.html#inline
> Interesting.  The ways the page suggests as fixes are
>  - change it to a "statis inline";
>  - remove "inline" from the definition;
>  - provide an external (non-inline) def somewhere else;
>  - compile with gnu899 dialect.

Right, option 3 seems perfectly reasonable to me, as we must be prepared
to cope with a decision not to inline the function, and there has to be
_some_ linked implementation. But shouldn't libc be providing an
external, linkable strcasecmp in this case?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to