Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:

> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Such a review comment and the discussion that follows it after a
>> patch is posted is an essential part of the collaborative
>> development process in this community and it has helped the quality
>> of our end product. We unfortunately saw time and again that the
>> process rarely works when the discussion involves your patches.
> No, you did not. What you saw was a person that unlike a trained dog, argued
> against you. And apparently your definition of a good discussion is one in
> which the other person just does what you say, and doesn't argue back.

That is so untrue that it is not even funny.  If the ultimate goal
of your whining is to spread misinformation to make you look like a
victim, you are not worth talking to.

Contributors often make sensible counter-arguments and/or explain
the rationale better than they did in their original messages, and
then receive a "Thanks for a dose of sanity" (or an equivalent
phrased in different ways).
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to