Yoshioka Tsuneo <yoshiokatsu...@gmail.com> writes: > And, it might be a bit nicer for me if the patch can be > rejected(or ignored as other patches) from the beginning if the > concept does not fit anyway.
Yes, but... > # Though I know we can know more after seeing the implementation, anyway :-) ... you are very correct about this. Note that I am not rejecting the topic yet. I am just saying that I am not yet convinced the patch improves the situation where an optimal solution (i.e. no information loss at all) cannot exist because we do not have enough output columns to work with. Thanks. >> ... >> So you are correct to say that I am still skeptical. >> >> In any case, the output from "diff --stat -M" should match the >> output from "apply --stat -M", I think. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
