On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:20:52PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Adam Spiers <g...@adamspiers.org> writes:
> > 2. What difference does --dense ever make?
> It is set by default, and --sparse is its opposite option, i.e. it
> turns revs->dense off.
Ah. It appears to be missing from the man page that it's the default.
> When revs->dense is turned off, the usual treesame logic does not
> kick in to rewrite parents in a single strand of pearls (i.e. a
> stretch of history that solely consists of non-merge commits).
> > 3. Why is --sparse so called, given that it increases rather than
> > decreases the number of commits shown?
> The number of commits in the output will increase by including
> commits that are irrelevant to explain the history of paths
> specified by pathspec in revs->prune. The information density
> decreases as the result, and that is what "sparse" signifies.
Ah OK, that makes sense now, but not the most intuitive choice of name
IMHO. I would have gone for something like --all-commits, but I guess
it's way too late to change now.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html