On 01/09/2014 09:11 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> writes:
>> It's possible, in principle, to shove enough metadata into the output
>> of 'git archive' to allow anyone to verify (without cloning the repo)
>> to verify that the archive is a correct copy of a given commit. Would
>> this be considered a useful feature?
>> Presumably there would be a 'git untar' command that would report
>> failure if it fails to verify the archive contents.
>> This could be as simple as including copies of the commit object and
>> all relevant tree objects and checking all of the hashes when
> You only need the object name of the top-level tree. After "untar"
> the archive into an empty directory, make it a new repository and
> "git add . && git write-tree"---the result should match the
> top-level tree the archive was supposed to contain.
This wouldn't work if any files were excluded from the archive using
gitattribute "export-ignore" (or "export-subst", which you already
mentioned in a follow-up email).
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html