David Kastrup wrote:
> So my understanding is that when we are talking about _significant_
> additions to builtin/blame.c (the current patches don't qualify as such
> really) that
> a) builtin/blame.c is licensed under GPLv2
> b) significant contributions to it will not be relicensed under
> different licenses without the respective contributors' explicit
Yep, that's how it works.
> The combination of the SubmittingPatches text with the file notices in
> builtin/blame.c is not really painting a full picture of the situation.
Any idea how this could be made more clear? E.g., maybe we should
bite the bullet and add a line to all source files that don't already
state a license:
* License: GPLv2. See COPYING for details.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html