Jonathan Nieder <> writes:

> David Kastrup wrote:
>> So my understanding is that when we are talking about _significant_
>> additions to builtin/blame.c (the current patches don't qualify as such
>> really) that
>> a) builtin/blame.c is licensed under GPLv2
>> b) significant contributions to it will not be relicensed under
>> different licenses without the respective contributors' explicit
>> consent.
> Yep, that's how it works.
> [...]
>> The combination of the SubmittingPatches text with the file notices in
>> builtin/blame.c is not really painting a full picture of the situation.
> Any idea how this could be made more clear?  E.g., maybe we should
> bite the bullet and add a line to all source files that don't already
> state a license:
>       /*
>        * License: GPLv2.  See COPYING for details.
>        */

I vaguely recall that jgit folks at one point wanted to lift this
implementation and were interested in seeing it to be dual licensed
to BSD but that was a long time ago.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to