Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:
> Sorry, this one slipped through the cracks. Here's a re-roll addressing
> your comments.
>> - In the context of "pack-objects", the name "--honor-pack-keep"
>> makes sense; it is understood that pack-objects will _not_ remove
>> kept packfile, so "honoring" can only mean "do not attempt to
>> pick objects out of kept packs to add to the pack being
>> generated." and there is no room for --no-honor-pack-keep to be
>> mistaken as "you canremove the ones marked to be kept after
>> saving the still-used objects in it away."
>> But does the same name make sense in the context of "repack"?
> I think the distinction you are making is to capture the second second
> from the docs:
> If set to false, include objects in `.keep` files when repacking via
> `git repack`. Note that we still do not delete `.keep` packs after
> `pack-objects` finishes.
> The best name I could come up with is "--pack-keep-objects", since that
> is literally what it is doing. I'm not wild about the name because it is
> easy to read "keep" as a verb (and "pack" as a noun). I think it's OK,
> but suggestions are welcome.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html