Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:

> I'd however have to say that even "please resolve the conflicts
> manually" is over-assuming.

I understand your point, but in a short hint message, I still find it
reasonable. Fixing conflicts is the natural way to go after a "stash
pop", and the user who do not want to go this way probably knows why.

> "The stash was not dropped" is the most important thing in your
> additional text.  How about rephrasing like this?
>     $ git stash pop
>     Auto-merging foo.txt
>     CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in foo.txt
>     The stashed change could not be replayed cleanly, leaving
>     conflicts in the working tree. The stash was not dropped in case
>     you need it again.
>     After you are done with the stash, you may want to "git stash
>     drop" to discard it.

I'm fine with this, but it's even longer than mine which I already found
too long. Perhaps the "leaving conflicts in the working tree" could be
dropped, as the message follows "CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in

Matthieu Moy
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to