On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 07:44:10PM +0900, Brian Gesiak wrote:
> > I notice that the warning comes from install_branch_config, which gets
> > used both for "branch -u", but also in the "side effect" case I
> > mentioned above. Is it possible to trigger this as part of such a case?
> > I think maybe "git branch -f --track foo foo" would do it. If so, we
> > should perhaps include a test that it does not break if we upgrade the
> > "-u" case to an error.
> Do you mean that install_branch_config should continue to emit a
> warning in the "side effect" case? I'm not sure I agree--how is "git
> branch -f --track foo foo" less erroneous than "git branch -u foo
> refs/heads/foo"? Perhaps I'm missing some insight on how "--track" is
I'd be more worried about triggering it via the config. E.g.:
git config branch.autosetupmerge always
git branch -f foo foo
Should the second command die? I admit I'm having a hard time coming up
with a feasible reason why anyone would do "branch -f foo foo" in the
first place. I just don't want to regress somebody else's workflow due
to my lack of imagination.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html