On 03/10/2014 01:08 PM, Brad King wrote:
>> -            die("update %s missing [<oldvalue>] NUL", update->ref_name);
>> +            die("update %s missing <oldvalue>", update->ref_name);
> The reason for the original wording is that the <oldvalue> is indeed
> optional.  This can only occur at end-of-input, and it is actually the
> *NUL* that is missing because an empty old value can be specified to
> mean that it it intentionally missing.

I see a following patch makes the wording even clearer about
unexpected end of input, so ignore my previous review.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to