Jeff King wrote:
> On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 01:12:53AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > So it looks like gcc is smarter now, and in trying to fix a few warnings
> > we generated hundreds more.
> > 
> > This reverts commit e208f9cc7574f5980faba498d0aa30b4defeb34f.
> And now we've gone the other way, and re-enabled the initial warnings.
> Can we come up with a solution that helps both cases?

What initial warnings? As I explained already I don't get any warnings
with this patch series in gcc 4.9.0.

Felipe Contreras
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to