David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes:
> Your premise is _not_ assumed in my statement. My premise was "a
> pointer to something of the same type of [the struct's] first member".
> That does quite explicitly _not_ state that an object of struct type is
> in existence.
So you are not taking about struct object_id, and it's irrelevant to
This thread is about objects of type struct object_id, and their address
is always the same as the address of its first member. Nothing else is
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html