David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: > Your premise is _not_ assumed in my statement. My premise was "a > pointer to something of the same type of [the struct's] first member". > That does quite explicitly _not_ state that an object of struct type is > in existence.
So you are not taking about struct object_id, and it's irrelevant to this thread. This thread is about objects of type struct object_id, and their address is always the same as the address of its first member. Nothing else is relevant. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
