Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes:
>> Your premise is _not_ assumed in my statement. My premise was "a
>> pointer to something of the same type of [the struct's] first member".
>> That does quite explicitly _not_ state that an object of struct type is
>> in existence.
> So you are not taking about struct object_id, and it's irrelevant to
> this thread.
> This thread is about objects of type struct object_id, and their address
> is always the same as the address of its first member. Nothing else is
Have it your way. I am too old for selective quotation games.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html