Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:
> > There is no guideline as for what should be part of contrib.
> > Some tools are actively maintained, others consist of a single commit.
> > Some tools have active user-base, some aren't used by anyone. Some tools
> > are on the path towards the core, others will never get there. Some
> > tools are already out-of-tree and simply mirrored, others probably
> > wouldn't survive out-of-tree. Some tools are production-ready, others
> > don't even run. Some tools have tests, most don't.
> > Junio has explained that he wrote this a long time ago, when Git was a
> > different beast, now this no longer applies.
> > The only way to find out if a tool belongs in contrib or not is to as
> > Junio.
> > Cc: Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> This is wrong.
> The reason I suggested splitting remote-hg out of my tree does not
This particular patch has nothing to do with remote-hg.
> have anything to do with "removal of disused and inactive" described
> in the document. As written elsewhere, it was a response to
> where you said
> I don't want to do anything for a "contrib" tool.
You are once more twisting the sequence of events.
*First* you blocked any progres towards graduation 2014-05-06, even
though I told you what John Keeping argued wasn't going to happen.
*After* that I decided not touch git-remote-hg/bzr on your tree any more
Do not attempt to construe the consequence as the cause. You caused it.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html