On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Erik Faye-Lund <kusmab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> What do you think is a good replacement for unix socket on Windows? >>> It's only used to refresh the cache in the daemon, no sensitive data >>> sent over, so security is not a problem. I'm thinking maybe just >>> TCP/IP server, but that's going to be a system-wide daemon.. Perhaps >>> the windows daemon could just monitor $GIT_DIR/index and refresh it? >> >> Windows has support for Named Pipes, which seems like the right kind >> of communication channel. However, the programming model differs quite >> a bit from unix-sockets: >> >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365594%28v=vs.85%29.aspx > > Yeah that was my first option, but if code cannot be shared to > differences then we probably should go another way. The old > FindWindow/PostMessage still works with modern Windows, right? Maybe > we could create a window with a name derived from the daemon's pid and > save the name in the index, then PostMessage can signal the daemon. On > the UNIX front, we store pid and send SIGUSR1 instead..The good thing > here is the Git side will be very simple (PostMessage vs kill).
Hmmm.... I'm a bit worried about having to load in USER32.DLL just to read the cache that way. But it seems we already do that, thanks to compat/poll/poll.c (it depends on DispatchMessage, MsgWaitForMultipleObjects, PeekMessage and TranslateMessage, all from that DLL). Preferably, we should delay-load USER32.DLL in compat/poll/poll.c, but if we start needing it for the reading the index, it'll be loaded by the vast majority of processes anyway. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
