Pete Wyckoff <p...@padd.com> writes:
> I'm not sure how to robustify this. At least doing the multiple
> comparisons should make the tests work again. The goal of this
> series of tests is to make sure that copy detection is working,
> not to verify that the correct copy choice was made. That should
> be in other (non-p4) tests.
"Choosing any of these as the copy source is fine" is a sensible way
to fix the problem with this test. Would it be a better solution to
avoid having multiple/ambiguous copy source candidates in the first
place, by the way?
> Do send patches based on Junio's master. I can ack, and they'll
> show up in a future git release.
> -- Pete
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html