"Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com> writes:
>> After all, it seems to me that the one in
>> struck the right balance among various abuses; let's use the error
>> reporter from that version, instead of going down this rabbit hole.
> So is that patch series version acceptable then? Or should I spin one
> again that is in that vein?
I do not offhand know what other changes you had in v9 since
$gmane/253346, so I'll leave it up to you. If the only difference
is the error reporting codepath, and you are happy with what I have
in my tree
$ git log -p --reverse -3 a93d886b9
then we can proceed with that version. Have there been any issues
raised on that older version other than error reporting?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html